{"id":527,"date":"2016-12-28T10:16:52","date_gmt":"2016-12-28T10:16:52","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/lundbennett.co.uk\/blog\/?p=527"},"modified":"2021-01-26T09:18:16","modified_gmt":"2021-01-26T09:18:16","slug":"ilott-v-mitson-bitter-inheritance-dispute-heard-in-the-supreme-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lundbennett.co.uk\/blog\/ilott-v-mitson-bitter-inheritance-dispute-heard-in-the-supreme-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Ilott v Mitson \u2013 bitter inheritance dispute heard in the Supreme Court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On Monday, 12 December 2016, the Supreme Court heard evidence in an appeal brought by three charities in the long running case of Ilott v Mitson. The claim was initially brought by a daughter against her mother\u2019s estate after most of it had been left to charity. The charities lost in the Court of Appeal and now seek to overturn that judgment.<\/p>\n<p>Mrs Jackson, the mother in this case, died in 2004. Mrs Ilott became estranged from her mother, Mrs Jackson, from the age of 17 and remained so for the rest of her mother\u2019s life despite several attempts at reconciliation. In Mrs Jackson\u2019s will, she left the majority of her estate to three charities (including the Blue Cross, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (RSPB) and the Royal Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (RSPCA))and made no provision for her only child, Mrs Ilott.<\/p>\n<p>Mrs Ilott made an application under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 for reasonable financial provision from her late mother\u2019s estate and received an initial award of \u00a350,000 in 2007 however she then appealed against the amount of this award. In July 2015, the Court of Appeal allowed Mrs Ilott\u2019s appeal and set aside the original award of \u00a350,000 and substituted it with its own award of:<\/p>\n<p>a) \u00a3143,000 to enable Mrs Ilott to purchase her housing association home;<br \/>\nb) The reasonable costs of the purchase; and<br \/>\nc) Payments up to a maximum of \u00a320,000 structured in a way that would allow Mrs Ilott to preserve her state benefits.<\/p>\n<p>The charities are now to appeal this decision the Supreme Court. The case of Ilott v Mitson has significantly changed legal understanding as it was previously difficult for \u2018adult children\u2019 to bring a claim under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. If the Supreme Court upholds the Court of Appeal decision, it is likely to encourage many more disgruntled \u2018adult children\u2019 may seek to bring claims of this kind in the future. The judgment from the Supreme Court is expected in the New Year.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Monday, 12 December 2016, the Supreme Court heard evidence in an appeal brought by three charities in the long running case of Ilott v Mitson. The claim was initially brought by a daughter against her mother\u2019s estate after most of it had been left to charity. The charities lost in the Court of Appeal&hellip;&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/lundbennett.co.uk\/blog\/ilott-v-mitson-bitter-inheritance-dispute-heard-in-the-supreme-court\/\" rel=\"bookmark\">Read More &raquo;<span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Ilott v Mitson \u2013 bitter inheritance dispute heard in the Supreme Court<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"neve_meta_sidebar":"","neve_meta_container":"","neve_meta_enable_content_width":"off","neve_meta_content_width":0,"neve_meta_title_alignment":"","neve_meta_author_avatar":"","neve_post_elements_order":"","neve_meta_disable_header":"","neve_meta_disable_footer":"","neve_meta_disable_title":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[10,139,137,175,140,138],"tags":[144,141,143,142],"class_list":["post-527","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-family-law","category-ilott","category-inheritance-dispute","category-lund-bennett","category-mitson","category-supreme-court","tag-ilott","tag-inheritance-dispute","tag-mitson","tag-supreme-court"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lundbennett.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/527","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lundbennett.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lundbennett.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lundbennett.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lundbennett.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=527"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/lundbennett.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/527\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1008,"href":"https:\/\/lundbennett.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/527\/revisions\/1008"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lundbennett.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=527"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lundbennett.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=527"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lundbennett.co.uk\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=527"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}